WebAuditOS vs CheckVibe
The vendor advertises live-app checks alongside source-code, dependency and connected cloud scanning, with MCP support.
Vendor information checked . This is a comparison of published capabilities, not a hands-on benchmark.
Pricing and billing
Starter was shown as GBP 24/month, or GBP 17/month on annual billing. The same page also displayed dollar prices in its comparison table. Confirm currency and billing at checkout. Official vendor source.
WebAuditOS: Free EUR 0/month; Starter EUR 29/month; Pro EUR 79/month; Super EUR 129/month; Agency EUR 399/month. See current plan limits and billing terms. Prices are not converted between currencies.
Capabilities and scope
| Capability | CheckVibe | WebAuditOS |
|---|---|---|
| Source repository analysis | Advertised for connected repositories | Not implemented |
| MCP interface | Listed in vendor pricing | REST API; no MCP server |
| Public website audit | Advertises live-app scanning | Documented checks with detection limits and manual attestations |
Where CheckVibe can be the better fit
CheckVibe advertises repository analysis and connected infrastructure checks, plus an MCP interface. Those surfaces can be a better fit when your review begins in source code or cloud configuration. WebAuditOS's scanner reads public website responses and does not inspect a connected source repository.
When WebAuditOS fits
Use WebAuditOS when you want a public website crawl with traceable findings, page evidence, category scores and a documented boundary between automated results and manual review. Plans change crawl capacity and the available workflow features. A scan cannot certify legal compliance, complete accessibility or private server configuration.
Compare the same representative pages and important journeys. Check which observations each tool makes, which states it cannot reach and how a resolved issue is verified. Match the tool to that task before comparing headline scores or check counts.
Inspect the check documentation, read the scoring methodology or open the illustrative report.