Skip to content

Test your website now

Free, no card. We read only public pages.

Run free audit →

Compliance · Low severity

Terms of Service Link Missing: Make the Applicable Contract Information Available

Review a missing terms link. Assess contract and consumer-information duties, publish relevant terms, and separate link recognition from legal sufficiency.

Published · Updated

What the check tests

Check
comp.terms - Terms of service linked
Passes when
The site should link a terms/conditions page.
Scope
graded once per site
Severity
Low
Fix effort
medium - a working day
Impact when fixed
low

In one paragraph

Terms of service link missing means the scan did not recognise a link matching its contract-related vocabulary. Assess what the service actually requires: relevant terms, consumer information, and contract formation are not satisfied by a footer label alone. Not every informational website needs a separate terms page, and a matching third-party link does not establish that the operator's own contractual obligations are met.

Why it matters

For covered EU consumer distance contracts, Directive 2011/83/EU sets pre-contractual information and contract-confirmation requirements, with timing, presentation, and durable-medium conditions. A web page link by itself is not necessarily the required confirmation or an instrument preserving information unchanged.

Contractual terms can explain the service, price model, duration, acceptable use, termination, and remedies as appropriate. They must reflect applicable mandatory law rather than assume every disclaimer, choice of law, or liability limitation is enforceable simply because the user clicks a box.

A separate page called Terms is one publication method, not a universal legal format. Privacy information, cookie consent, accessibility duties, and operator disclosures have distinct roles. Combining them carelessly can obscure what the user agrees to and what merely informs them.

How WebAuditOS evaluates this finding

The supplied site-wide rule matches observed anchor text or addresses against terms-related expressions in selected languages, with documented rendered-link fallback. A match passes; no match on readable pages warns at low severity; unavailable coverage can be ungraded.

It does not retrieve the content or evaluate incorporation, fairness, required information, storage, or acceptance. A provider's terms, search-term page, or broad translated substring can pass. A legitimate differently named contract resource can be missed.

How to fix it

  1. Identify the offering, buyer type, jurisdictions, and actual contract process. An informational site, consumer shop, and enterprise service have different needs.
  2. Review required information and relevant terms with appropriate expertise. Do not assume default statutory rules disappear or every clause copied from another service applies.
  3. Publish a usable stable resource. For example:
<a href="/terms">Service terms</a>

Create the actual relevant content. The link alone does not establish valid incorporation or every pre-contractual duty.

  1. Present applicable information before the commitment in the appropriate way. Review order wording, prices, duration, renewal, cancellation, withdrawal where applicable, and any service-specific requirements.
  2. Provide the required contract confirmation and accessible preservation method under the applicable rules. An ordinary editable web page is not automatically a durable medium merely because it can be bookmarked.
  3. Distinguish agreement to terms from consent for optional tracking or another processing purpose. Avoid one bundled checkbox that purports to solve every obligation.
  4. Maintain version, effective-date, and operational ownership appropriate to the service. Test access, readable language, keyboard navigation, and consistency with billing or support workflows.
  5. Rescan link recognition and separately review the real contractual journey. A green result does not certify legal validity or completeness.

What the fix can break

A global terms edit can change customer expectations or conflict with existing agreements. Review the actual change process rather than silently replacing substantive terms.

Copied legal text can identify the wrong operator, service, or remedies. Verify facts and mandatory rules.

Do not add a misleading link to a provider's agreement solely to clear the scan. The user needs the information relevant to the actual relationship.

Questions

Is a dedicated terms page required for every site?

No universal conclusion follows from this finding. Identify the specific service and legal duties.

Not by itself. Formation, incorporation, content, and required information need separate assessment.

No. Keep the applicable purposes and legal mechanisms distinct.

Review privacy information, operator contact, and the website audit checklist.

In the report

Test this on your own site

Every scan runs comp.terms on every page it crawls, on every plan. The finding carries this id, so a line in a report can be matched to the explanation above - and the free scan needs no account.